Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:23 am Post subject: why is bias field usually a multiplicative model?
can anyone please enlighten me on the following:
1. Why is it that when i go through many papers, authors assume bias field (also known as intensity inhomogeneity) to be a multiplicative model and not additive?
2. Which segmentation method is most resistive towards intensity inhomogeneity?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Home
FAQ
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Messages
Login/Out
