|
|
| Author
|
|
MissE Moderator

Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 159 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:46 pm Post subject: Why do we angle the tube on a knee? |
|
What is the reasoning for angling the tube on a knee radiograph? |
|
|
|
|
Adriana
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 10 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
On a lateral projection of the knee the tube is angled 5-10 degrees cephalic. This is done to superimpose the distal borders of the femoral condyles.
On an AP projection of the knee the tube is angled 3-5 degrees cephalic. This is done to open up the joint space.
Am I close? 1st year student here.  |
|
|
|
|
xrayquilter Power User

Joined: 04 Jul 2006 Posts: 120 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:19 am Post subject: Why do we angle the tube on a knee? |
|
I'm a 1st year student, also After looking in my book, I think you hit the nail on the head with your answer! Without looking it up, I would have just said that it's done to open up the joint space!
My book says to angle 7-10* on a short patient with wide pelvis, but only angle 5* on a tall (male) patient with a narrow pelvis~~for the lateral.
For the AP, the degree of angulation depends on the size of the patient. For a patient who measures less than 19 cm. (from ASIS to tabletop), you angle 3-5* caudad. This is a person with thin thighs & buttocks.
For the patient who measures 19-24 cm. (ASIS to TT), you don't angle at all.
And for the patient who measures more than 24 cm. (ASIS to TT), you angle 3-5*cephalad. This is a person who has thick thighs & buttocks. This is the most commonly used. |
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:17 pm Post subject: Re: Why do we angle the tube on a knee? |
|
| xrayquilter wrote: | I'm a 1st year student, also After looking in my book, I think you hit the nail on the head with your answer! Without looking it up, I would have just said that it's done to open up the joint space!
My book says to angle 7-10* on a short patient with wide pelvis, but only angle 5* on a tall (male) patient with a narrow pelvis~~for the lateral.
For the AP, the degree of angulation depends on the size of the patient. For a patient who measures less than 19 cm. (from ASIS to tabletop), you angle 3-5* caudad. This is a person with thin thighs & buttocks.
For the patient who measures 19-24 cm. (ASIS to TT), you don't angle at all.
And for the patient who measures more than 24 cm. (ASIS to TT), you angle 3-5*cephalad. This is a person who has thick thighs & buttocks. This is the most commonly used. | Yes, both of you are correct. But why would we have to angle the tube to get the epicondyles superimposed? |
|
|
|
|
xrayquilter Power User

Joined: 04 Jul 2006 Posts: 120 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
Is it because the condyles aren't on the same level straight across? I may be way off base here, but isn't the lateral condyle higher than the medial?  |
|
|
|
|
RadMaster Site Admin
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:50 am Post subject: Lateral Knee Radiograph |
|
| xrayquilter wrote: | Is it because the condyles aren't on the same level straight across? I may be way off base here, but isn't the lateral condyle higher than the medial?  |
You are correct. It's also due to the magnification of the medial. _________________ Radiology Schools
Nursing Schools |
|
|
|
|
MissE Moderator

Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 159 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
Yes That was the answer I was looking for. Great job everyone!! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|