Radiology Discussion Boards
Welcome Visitor, Please Register or Login
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author
traineetech



Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:44 pm    Post subject: Question for wvaio Reply with quote

Hi, wvaio, you helped me out a little before about ionisation chambers, but I am still a little confued, so wondered if you can help me out.

First question:

I think what I'm confused with is the actual definition of a bucky. Is the bucky the same thing as the grid or are they two separate things? I get confused with people at placement saying out of bucky or out of grid etc...

I thought that the word bucky was just another name for a grid, but maybe I'm wrong? Or is the word bucky just another name for the ionization chambers?

I know what a grid is (an anti scatter device) but I thought that if you're using a grid, you're automatically using a bucky, but maybe I'm wrong here. Could you clear this up for me?

Second question:

At placement we use both digital radiography and CR.

Say you did a chest X-Ray using CR with no AEC, with 96kV and 3.5mAs - Is it the ionization chambers' job to detect when 3.5mAS has been used up before termination the exposure or have I got that wrong?

IE, what is the difference betwween an ionization chamber and an automatic exposure device? Do AED's have ionzation chambers?

Just confused here, and could do with some help

Thanks and hope you can help

traineetech



Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another question before you hopefully reply...

Say you set a manual technique of 55kV and 3.2mAs, it would peak at 3.2mAs and cut off.

But if you use an AEC with the same expsure factors, it would also cut off at 3.2 mAs

So what is the difference between the two? Why use one over the other if you see what I mean?

Unless the words 'manual' refer to the fact that no chamber/aec device is used, and that the machine itself will cut off at 3.2 for a manual technique? Whereas on an AEC technique, it's the chambers that detect the 3.2 before cutting off?

I'm getting confused!

wvaio



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First off "manual" means that there is NO AEC used. You choose a set kVp and mAs. The tube produces that exposure. The system calculates the exposure by determining a set mA and time, equaling mAs. If you set 3.2 mAs manually, the system will produce 3.2 mAs, not peak. If you shoot 10 times at 3.2 mAs, theoretically you would have 10 exposures of 3.2 mAs.

Secondly, The term "bucky" refers to the reciprocating grid that is housed inside of the table or upright wall unit. The Bucky can be used with AEC or with a manual technique. Either way, milliseconds before the start of the exposure, the grid begins reciprocating to blur the grid lines and clean up scatter. The Bucky is completely separate from the AEC system. The term "bucky" is loosely used as a term to describe the drawer that holds the cassette. It is actually called a bucky drawer. The wall unit as a whole can also be referred to as a bucky because it houses a bucky unit within it. The actual bucky moves in unicine with the bucky drawer, so that they are always positioned together.

The AED or AEC(one in the same) uses the ionization chambers. They calculate the number of photons that have passed through the patient and scattered by the patient.

After reading this, reread the prior post on ionization chambers again and see if it starts to make more sense.

Feel free to keep asking questions. I am more than happy to answer them all. It keeps me sharp!

Wvaio

traineetech



Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks, wvaio. I now understand it all apart from one part:

'When a pre-determined number of photons hit the cassette, the aec tells the machine to stop'

Who sets the pre-determined number? How is it set? How does the aec know when enough photons have hit the cassette to produce optimum density and tell the machine to stop?

That's the part I don;t understand?

I mean, how does the machine know whether the patient is going to be fat or thin, and therefore know when to stop exposing?

I hope you understand what I mean, and thanks for your help so far...

wvaio



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is the final key to the puzzle.

The way that the AEC determines whether the person is thin or thick. Think of the possible interactions with matter. Some x-rays will pass right through the body and others will be attenuated by the body. The AEC is only going to count the x-rays that are passed completely the patient and those that are scattered from the patient. It can't count the photons absorbed by the body, or those that are scatter in different directions other than right towards the detectors. Lets say that on a thin patient 8 out of 10 x-rays per second will pass through the patient (or scatter toward the detectors). On a thicker patient only 4 out of 10 pass through per second. If the predetermined number was 80, and if the machine shoots 10 x-rays per second the thin patient would be exposed for 10 seconds. The thick patient would have to be exposed for 20 seconds. These are not real world numbers of course.

That predetermined number is set by the person that calibrates the machine. I don't know any more than that. It could be set by the exposure fairy for all I know. That is the realm of the radiology technician.

Make sense?

Wvaio

traineetech



Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, I See what you mean now ( I think)

So, on a thinner patient, the AEC would detect that the cassette would have reached its 'pre-determined' density quicker than that of a larger person due to them having less 'bulk' so to speak for the x-rays to pass through, and for the AEC to detect?

Meaning that the pre-determined (optimum density) is reached regardless of patient size, but for larger patients, this may mean that exposure time is a little higher (unless, of course, the tech ups the kV which would balance things out a little) ?

I hope I've got this now!?!

Do you think that the AEC's pre-determined density level was set by the manufacturer of the unit, or maybe some group of boffins somewhere after much testing?

wvaio



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes you have it!
I will ask the technician at work and get back to you on the predetermined density. I would imagine that it is set by the manufacturer but is calibrated by the physicist that does the QA. I will find out and get back to you. I never tracked it back any further than what I have explained in the posts.


Wvaio

traineetech



Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great thanks! I'll look forward to hearing back from you about te pre-determind thing.

Also, one last question about all of this:

Does this mean then that theoretically, the AEC's pre-determined denisty (mAs) figure is pre-set at the same level for each patient regardless of patient size, and that the mAs figure after exposure should reveal identical levels of mAs given for differing patients, but with differing ms times?

IE, If the AEC's pre-determined mAs level for a CXR was pre-set at 5mAS, will every patient's mAs reading after exposure read 5mAs, but display differing ms times due to differing patient sizes?

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB
Xray Forums Archive - Radiology Jobs - Radiology Schools - Continuing Education - Online Nursing Schools Alabama Radiology Schools - Alaska Radiology Schools - Arizona Radiology Schools - Arkansas Radiology Schools - California Radiology Schools - Colorado Radiology Schools - Columbia (D.C.) Radiology Schools - Connecticut Radiology Schools - Delaware Radiology Schools - Florida Radiology Schools - Georgia Radiology Schools - Hawaii Radiology Schools - Idaho Radiology Schools - Illinois Radiology Schools - Indiana Radiology Schools - Iowa Radiology Schools - Kansas Radiology Schools - Kentucky Radiology Schools - Louisiana Radiology Schools - Maine Radiology Schools - Maryland Radiology Schools - Massachusetts Radiology Schools - Michigan Radiology Schools - Minnesota Radiology Schools - Mississippi Radiology Schools - Missouri Radiology Schools - Montana Radiology Schools - Nebraska Radiology Schools - Nevada Radiology Schools - New Hampshire Radiology Schools - New Jersey Radiology Schools - New Mexico Radiology Schools - New York Radiology Schools - North Carolina Radiology Schools - North Dakota Radiology Schools - Ohio Radiology Schools - Oklahoma Radiology Schools - Oregon Radiology Schools - Puerto Rico Radiology Schools - Pennsylvania Radiology Schools - Rhode Island Radiology Schools - South Carolina Radiology Schools - South Dakota Radiology Schools - Tennessee Radiology Schools - Texas Radiology Schools - Utah Radiology Schools - Vermont Radiology Schools - Virginia Radiology Schools - Washington Radiology Schools - West Virginia Radiology Schools - Wisconsin Radiology Schools - Wyoming Radiology Schools

ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org