|
|
|
|
| How well does your PACS hang related prior exams? |
| Automatically and unfailingly. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Mostly automatically, but I have to check. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Passably. There's a lot of clicking on studies. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Abysmally. Selection is manual. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 0 |
|
| Author
|
|
RadWriter
Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 3
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:21 am Post subject: Poor Comparison Hanging |
 |
I'm writing an article about automated comparison hanging, and why it doesn't work with most PACS. Why is no one talking about this? A computer should be able to know what studies are related to the current study. The radiologist shouldn't have to hunt and click!
Please tell me your experience. |
|
|
|
|
papa
Power User
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Location: The State of Confusion
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
most likely because this is a forum for techs, and most techs don't care how it hangs.....
boy that sounds bad 
i think there's another site here for rads, but i don't know what it is.
....
auntminnie has rads!...
papa RT(R)(CT)
_________________
papa RT(R)(CT)
http://sites.google.com/site/delusionalradiology
never meddle in the affairs of a dragon, for you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup |
|
|
|
|
hjhogle
Moderator
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 610
Location: New Haven, CT
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
Also, it may be that there are many PACS products that do pull comparisons and do it well.
Specific exam hanging protocols are a different story, but pulling related priors? I've used several products that do this - doesn't seem to be a big deal. |
|
|
|
|
RadWriter
Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
Thanks to papa for pointing out that this is a tech, not a rad, forum.
I do know that some PACS require manual maintenance of a spreadsheet of related procedures. Computers are too stupid to know that a CXR2V is related to a 2VCXR, let alone a Chest PA, Lateral and Obliques.
I've been told by rads with several different PACS that only the most common procedures hang automatically without their PACS administrators maintaining a rigorous list. |
|
|
|
|
Emile
Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject: Re: Poor Comparison Hanging |
|
| RadWriter wrote: | I'm writing an article about automated comparison hanging, and why it doesn't work with most PACS. Why is no one talking about this? A computer should be able to know what studies are related to the current study. The radiologist shouldn't have to hunt and click!
Please tell me your experience. |
In automated comparison hanging you are talking about a viewing/ reporting mode for radiologists. This differs from the hanging protocols where most PACS vendors are talking about.
Two problems:
What is missing is the inteligence to know when what has to be compared.
Most hardware vendors have different DICOM haeder info which is not comparable in uses as optional fields f.i.
And there are some other small problems. But I could write a book about that... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
  |
| How well does your PACS hang related prior exams? |
| Automatically and unfailingly. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Mostly automatically, but I have to check. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Passably. There's a lot of clicking on studies. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Abysmally. Selection is manual. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 0 |
|
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Home
FAQ
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Messages
Login/Out
