|
|
|
|
| Author
|
|
brandi19720
Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 2
Location: Newark, DE
|
 Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: MRI techs, please respond ASAP! |
 |
 I am interested in receiving opinions on the following topic:
Should MRI technologists be ARRT registered radiologic technologists?
I worked with a former co-worker who was not a x-ray tech. He simply went through a one year MRI school and took a test administered by ARMRIT. I did not know this was legal and the more I have researched his training, the more confused I am on my stance on this subject.
Please respond!! Brandi RT (R), (MR) |
|
|
|
|
lorraine
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 4
Location: Los Angeles
|
| Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
 hi brandi,well having a arrt lisence gets you in the door faster then armrit,ive been looknig for 8 months now,since i dont have a arrt lisence its hard. |
|
|
|
|
wilks61
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: license |
|
sure should be---- also RT should be a bachelor program. |
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:20 pm Post subject: Re: license |
|
| wilks61 wrote: | | sure should be---- also RT should be a bachelor program. |
While I agree that MRI techs should first be registered by the ARRT, I don't see the need for RAD techs to go through a BS program...
RN programs typically aren't BS programs, so that's what I base my opinion on.
I do believe that radiology parallel programs such as MRI, CT, NM, etc should coincide with a BS program. Most do, but not ALL. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
  |
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Home
FAQ
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Messages
Login/Out