Radiology Discussion Boards

Google

Welcome Visitor, Please Register or Login
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author
hjhogle
Moderator


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 608
Location: CT

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CigarPete wrote:
Heather posts to tell us she's not going to post?

hunh?

Haha

Didn't want you to think I was slackin' off!
hjh, RT

papa
Power User


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 204
Location: The State of Confusion

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, this just bugs me....

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/technician

Quote:
American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
tech·ni·cian (tk-nshn)
n.

One whose occupation requires training in a specific technical process. Also called technologist.

The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.


any way we can get that changed?

papa
_________________
Mr. Green papa RT(R)(CT) Mr. Green

http://sites.google.com/site/delusionalradiology

never meddle in the affairs of a dragon, for you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup

Funny Bones



Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm a second year student and work PRN at an ortho clinic where the lead tech is an LPT. He's more competent than many RT's that I work with at my hospital. He went through one of those technical school programs as mentioned above and has accumulated over five years experience.

The thing is... He's stuck as an LPT. To get his RT, he's gotta' go back through a 2-year program.

And personally, I don't have an issue with the whole "technician" vs "technologist" labeling thing.

hjhogle
Moderator


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 608
Location: CT

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of the functions of an LPT is to allow facilities and physician offices to stay within the letter of the law, yet avoid paying for a fully-licensed imager. Potential for abuse of the position is high, and there are few, if any checks in place to prevent it. (Abuse not meaning assault on the employee with the limited license .. abuse meaning allowing/encouraging the employee to perform outside their scope of practice). "Quick" techs have neither the education nor experience needed when exposing the public to ionizing radiaton - a priority of the professional imager.

Having an LPT does not qualify someone to use the RT certification - that's why the certifications are not interchangable. Of course an LPT would have to complete an additional program in order to become eligible to take the national certification exam.

While your LPT may have accumulated 5 years experience as a limited technician in a orthopedic office, that simply qualifies him to work in an orthopedic office. It hardly prepares him for the variety of demands placed on an RT. If I wanted to interpret radiographs, I'd have to go to medical school - having accumulated 30 years of related experience would not entitle me to skip that.

There have been numerous similar threads in this forum and others. It is rare to find a radiographer (nationally certified RT) who supports limited licensure.

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB
Xray Forums Archive - Radiology Jobs - Radiology Schools - Continuing Education - Online Nursing Schools

ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org