Radiology Top 100
Radiology Discussion Boards

Welcome Visitor, Please Register or Login
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Forum: Radiology Student Chat Zone
Topic: Distortion?

Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author
lucky_yooh07



Joined: 26 Jan 2009
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:42 pm    Post subject: Distortion? Reply with quote

Could someone explain distortion to me?

Calculus



Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Distortion - The alteration of the original shape (or other characteristic) of an object, image, sound, waveform or other form of information or representation.

Remember that Contrast and Density are two photographic properties that comprise visibility of detail, well, in addition to Recorded Detail, Distortion is the second of two geometric properties affecting radiographic image quality.

Unlike the photographic properties of density and contrast which control the visibility of detail, the geometric properties control detail itself. Distortion is a misrepresentation of the size or shape of the structure being examined. It creates a misrepresentation of the size and/or shape of the anatomical part being examined. This misrepresentation can be classified as either size or shape distortion.

Distortion, like recorded detail, exists even when it cannot be seen due to poor visibility or, in other words, when the density and/or contrast are poor. The evaluation and adjustment of distortion require a thorough familiarity with normal radiographic anatomy. Unless the normal shape and size of a structure are actually known, comparison of the size and shape cannot be accomplished.

Distortion can be difficult to determine even when normal sizes and shapes are known. Because the objective of radiography is to provide accurate images of structures, methods of minimising distortion are important to diagnosis.

wvaio



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 85

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Distortion is not always good and not always bad. There is always distortion on every image because the image is never exactly the same as the patient. Reason being, the divergent beam. This being said, it is necessary to control the effects of distortion to create a diagnostic image.

There are two different types of distortion: size and shape

Size distortion is controlled by distances. If you increase your SID(source to image distance) you can decrease the inherent magnification. That is why we use 72" on a chest X-ray. The added SID creates an image that more closely represents the actual size of the heart and other structures. This is also why we perform a left lateral instead of a right lateral. Placing the heart closer to the IR(image receptor) reduces the OID(object to image distance) and therefore reduces the magnification.

Shape distortion is controlled by angulation and by alignment. Alignment of the cassette, the part being imaged, and the central ray are critical. Generally speaking, you want the part to be parallel to the cassette and the central ray to be perpendicular to the part and cassette. Shadows can be used to imagine the effects of distortion. If you take a flashlight and shine it toward your hand onto a table, you shadow is bigger than your hand because of divergence. The further from the table your hand is, the bigger it gets and vice-versa. If you keep your hand flat and then angle the flashlight the shadow of your hand will become elongated. This is distortion. If you move the flashlight back up to straight up and down and then angle your hand down to a 45 degree angle, your hand will appear shorter than it actually is. Finally, if you take a book and lay it at a 45 degree angle and then shine a flashlight down onto your hand, your hand will appear longer than it actually is. Light has the same fundamental effects as X-rays; both possess a divergent beam. Grab a flashlight and try these tests. Distortion will make complete sense.

Distortion can be used to enhance an image. The RAO sternum is a perfect example. If you utilize a 30" SID, the posterior riblettes will be "distorted" because of the short SID and the long OID, making them lose detail . Since the sternum is so close to the IR it will still possess its recorded detail and be less obscured by posterior riblettes. (Riblettes is more fun to say than ribs)

One more example of the benefits of distortion is the L-spine. While it is usually performed in an AP projection, using a PA projection would better visualize the joint spaces because they would mirror the divergent beam due to the lordotic curve of the lumbar. ///lll\\\ vs. \\\\lll////

Hope that helps. If you have more questions, feel free as always to ask.
Wvaio
_________________
“Whether you think that you can, or that you can't, you are usually right.” --- Henry Ford

hjhogle
Moderator


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 1047
Location: New Haven, CT

PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Calculus - when quoting from text or other published sources, referencing that source is the way to go. Otherwise, it looks like you're attempting to pass off someone else's material as your own.

Which I know you didn't intend.

hjh, RT

dawnzky05



Joined: 13 Feb 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We should always consider the machine function and related factors causing distortion. On the other hand, patient's condition might also cause this one.

Calculus



Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hjhogle:

I didn't realise I'd be required to post references on an internet chat forum.

hjhogle
Moderator


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 1047
Location: New Haven, CT

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha! This is an anonymous forum .. you're hardly "required" to do anything at all (including actually being a professional imager).

Certainly if you have a problem with citing a source, leave it out.

hjh, RT

Calculus



Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good to hear

Wink

wvaio



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 85

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hjh is very correct.While this is an anonymous message board, it should still be necessary to quote a source when quoting verbatim. Carlton and Adler spent their time, effort, and energy to write the text in the book and should be credited for such. Not doing so questions the integrity of the forum and is unprofessional. Please give credit where credit is due. Everyone would want the same consideration.

Wvaio

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy



Powered by phpBB

Radiology - Radiology Technician Schools - Radiology Programs - Nursing Schools - Radiology Schools

ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org