|
|
|
|
| Author
|
|
rt04 Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
fuji is the best of the two |
|
|
|
|
jed Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
i've used the kodak dr. loved it! of course it was the cr or dr i've used. i'm still stuck in the stone age (phototimer). |
|
|
|
|
omkesha
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:02 am Post subject: Kodak vs. Agfa |
|
We are used Kodak CR 400 & now Kodak CR 800 & CR 900 and we found it excellent, and kodak engineers are doing great maintenance...Agfa is excellent also and easy to use...  |
|
|
|
|
NAT

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Commonwealth of Virginia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
I've been using Kodak CR 500 since May... as a student, I think it's great. Especially being able to flip the image into the correct anatomical position and adding notes via the 'text' feature.
I used old-styled film for 7 months before learning CR and as far as I'm concerned, and learning CR [and eventually DR] is half the reason of getting into imaging technology [the other half was working with patients, BTW]. |
|
|
|
|
dicomvv
Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 3 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
All of the new release of Kodak CR are very good. I worked with many of them. _________________ T.Bui
DICOM Specialist Engineer |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|