Radiology Top 100
Radiology Discussion Boards

Welcome Visitor, Please Register or Login
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author
TechTwo
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 1:04 pm    Post subject: Anyone Using Kodak CR? Reply with quote

I was wondering if anyone likes Kodak CR? We have been having troubles.
TT

nobby
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What sort of problems?, we're about to take the plunge and go with kodak

TechTwo
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:47 am    Post subject: Kodak Reply with quote

The readers keep breaking down. The system seems hard to work with compared to others. Less user functions.

TT

radioactive
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:48 pm    Post subject: I hear fuji makes a great CR Reply with quote

has anyone uesd both a fuji and a kodak CR, which is better.

MyVote
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:58 am    Post subject: Fuji Pacs Reply with quote

I like the Fuji system better and have used both extensively.

rt04
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fuji is the best of the two

jed
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i've used the kodak dr. loved it! of course it was the cr or dr i've used. i'm still stuck in the stone age (phototimer).

omkesha



Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:02 am    Post subject: Kodak vs. Agfa Reply with quote

We are used Kodak CR 400 & now Kodak CR 800 & CR 900 and we found it excellent, and kodak engineers are doing great maintenance...Agfa is excellent also and easy to use... Smile

NAT



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 34
Location: Commonwealth of Virginia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been using Kodak CR 500 since May... as a student, I think it's great. Especially being able to flip the image into the correct anatomical position and adding notes via the 'text' feature.

I used old-styled film for 7 months before learning CR and as far as I'm concerned, and learning CR [and eventually DR] is half the reason of getting into imaging technology [the other half was working with patients, BTW].

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy



Powered by phpBB

Radiology - Radiology Technician Schools - Radiology Programs - Nursing Schools - Radiology Schools

ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org