|
|
| Author
|
|
stutech
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 29 Location: NC
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: A kV and mA question |
|
1) If for an Ap ab for a UGI you set a manual technique at 70 kVp and 46 mAs and you introduce barium for the exam; what would your manual technique(mAs) change to if the kVp was changed to 110 for the oblique views of the stomach?
2) Why did you change the kV?
3) What is the advantage of changing the kV to 110 vs 90 as far as the pt is concerned?
________
Dl1000 V-Strom
Last edited by stutech on Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:00 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
Gotta do so math with that problem. |
|
|
|
|
stutech
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 29 Location: NC
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
It's easy math though.
________
MFLB
Last edited by stutech on Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
xrayquilter Power User

Joined: 04 Jul 2006 Posts: 120 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
You change the kV because the barium is a positive contrast agent, which has a high atomic number, therefore absorbing more x-rays than the surrounding tissue. If you're increasing the kV, then you should decrease the mAs to maintain the same density as without the contrast. The advantage to changing the kV to 110 is that you reduce the mAs even more, reducing exposure time to the patient. Am I close  |
|
|
|
|
stutech
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Posts: 29 Location: NC
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
You are correct. You would half the mAs for every 15% or about every ten you go up in kV below 100 so the mAs would end up being halved four times equaling 3.
________
Vaporizer Wiki |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|